Olive and recent rearrangement of bzr-gtk
jelmer at samba.org
Fri Jun 18 09:58:59 BST 2010
On Fri, 2010-06-18 at 09:15 +0100, Russel Winder wrote:
> I spotted the removal of olive-gtk from the bzr-gtk plugin. This seems
> fine, especially if there is an intention to make Olive "pluggable" so
> that there is olive-kde as well as olive-gtk.
The Olive Launchpad page still mentions olive-kde, but it has mentioned
that since it was created. I don't think there are any current plans to
create an Olive-KDE anymore (it seems unnecessary given we already have
> I have branched lp:olive but this gives rise to some questions that I
> think I need to ask rather than just experiment and potentially cause
> more headaches than needed.
> 0. Does Olive have to be installed to be used or can it be used direct
> from the branch?
Yes, you should be able to use it directly from the branch.
> 1. Installing Olive would seem to conflict with the package from Lucid,
> i.e. it overwrites things installed by the package system thereby
> leading (potentially) to problems.
Right, but this was true when it was still a part of bzr-gtk as well.
> 2. Is there going to be a PPA for Olive so that there can be a package
> that would indicate the conflicts?
I'm not aware of any plans for this (yet), though I expect we'll package
Olive for Debian and Ubuntu.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : https://lists.canonical.com/archives/bzr-gtk/attachments/20100618/7ca1a458/attachment.pgp
More information about the bzr-gtk